34 thoughts on “Rules analyst Christina Unkel didn’t see any issue with England’s first goal vs. Norway 👀”

  1. There could have been radio interference for 0.2 seconds or so as the ball slightly brushed against a metal cable carrying voltage for the camera. Like a Faraday effect blocking the chip signal. From the video it is obvious the ball dropped down. They can not use video angles of various cameras to calculate the parabolic path with spin and friction and wind? I think give each team 2 challenges per game with VAR and let the referees call the game otherwise.

  2. i just think they had that excuse ready cos people did this in germany i think when these cables first started affecting games, there clearly was zero change in the balls travel

  3. Yeah it didn't happen, backspin at best and this is a pathetic low for so called vikings…

    Norway played like children, their manager acted like a spoiled brat child having tantrums and throwing bottles and they got beat by the better team.

    What did happen though was a last man stomp on Bellingham's achilles that should've been a red card. Funny how you're all ignoring that.

  4. If you look carefully you can see both Sørloth and Nyland reacting imidiatly when the ball hit the item in the air. Why would they do this if it didnt hit? They both put the the arm i the air when it drops to Anderson….so this is before the goal

  5. Stadium spidercams are operational during the whole game therefore if the ball hit the wire the spidercam would bounce around and the images being sent back live to the broadcast machine would show like it was an earthquake. Get the raw video footage from the TV broadcaster and see at the alleged time of impact does the video footage look like an earthquake has hit or is the recording image smooth.

  6. We have eyes. That its not a "rainbow arch." It hit something to drop down like that. Simple physics. I've seen them showing it from different angles and it's more clear it did. Officials keep talking sensors when eyesight is enough.

  7. If FIFA has the refs and VAR on Englands side why didn’t they just award Spence‘s perfectly blatant penalty? Why sabotage the ball sensor and hope for a spider can assist? The whole thing is mental. It seems like half the world are conspiracy theorists.

  8. Why is it that this world cup has become woke. Every game shown has caused controversy with someone complaining about the ref. The gaol that was dissalowed because Haarland pushed over a player and everyone moaning that the ball wasn't in play. The Ref and pundits explained in great detail why it was disallowed but people still moaned. The constant moaning is ruining the game as we once knew it!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top