Andrew Wiebe is back for another edition of Instant Replay as he goes over the most controversial plays from Matchday 30.
📺 Watch every match with MLS Season Pass on Apple TV: http://apple.co/MLS
The 🐐 plays here. Join The Messi Insider for insider news, early access to Messi promotions and more: https://www.mlssoccer.com/messi/
➡️ Subscribe Now: https://www.youtube.com/c/mls
➡️ Follow us on:
– TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mls?lang=en
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mls
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLS
– Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MLS
➡️ Para Español:
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mlses
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLSes
– Facebook: facebook.com/espanol.mls
For more information about MLS, go to the league’s official website: http://www.MLSsoccer.com
#mls #highlights #mlsseasonpass
source
Does this type of series exist for any other league? Andrew and the other host who was doing it for years and even god dam cheese it’s deserve at least a little praise for doing these every week, I eat them up like they are any other snack food than cheese it’s.
It's cute that trolls are saying "well AKSHUALLY " about the PK and getting it wrong. Encroachment doesn't have to involve the player interfering with the goalkeeper to result in a retake. That's one definition.
The other, straight from the laws of the game, is
the encroaching player plays the ball or challenges an opponent for the ball and then scores, attempts to score or creates a goal-scoring opportunity
That clearly applies here. If there's a miss and a second opportunity and the encroacher plays the ball or scores…retake
2:02 I don't think there even WAS a grab, the defender arm goes out, which is stupid of him, but I don't think he grabs onto anything
Taylor Patricia Lee Patricia Hernandez Angela
For the PK he didn’t directly get involved for encroaching. Had the ball gone straight to him then i believe VAR would have intervened.
So much simulation it spoils the game. Some contact is not always enough contact.
on the last Columbus goal theres no way you can get mad at Unkle for that. He is in a really good position for the cross which gets block and does what ever other ref would to when the ball is coming right at you, get out of the way and it happened to be in the way of the player. If anyone had bad positioning here it was the nyc player
Stupid penalty rule. It has to be one shot only. Just like in overtime shootout
2:17 No one calls a it DOGSO, stop
I say handball but ALSO say not clear and obvious.
Ten Uncle is good but I don't think center ref should ever be inside the box during active play cuz he could get in the way
Dang man. Great insight. Keep it up.
Uncle is the worst ref ever
It's called a penalty…not a PK…
Wiebe, regarding the Robinson yellow: it had to be reckless because freeman played advantage. Advantage on spa downgrades to no cards. So freeman probably fell for the acting as a hit to the face. Of potentially he deemed it lacking respect for the game I guess, the generic unsporting behavior caution which you can pretty much give for anything even if you play advantage (usually given to cynical holding or stuff way off the ball that’s not “part of the game”)
Wiebe, Unkel said no penalty because the ball hit O'Tooles chest first. Does that change the call?
As per IFAB, if the ball deflects off the body and onto the hand – then no handball offence has been committed.
1:00 , 1:59 Andrew admonishes one player for embellishment, but not the other. They absolutely both embellished and by the book those are both fouls, but to call one of them out and even say he probably could have run through the contact but not the other seems inconsistent.
Encroaching only applies if and when the goal is made . Do your research . Goalie blocking the pk makes it a different play
Second play was a total dive……yes, there is a momentary shirt grab but @2:00 and @2:04 Kelseyijust stops running and collapses – watch his left leg move forward and then just "takes a knee" when he realizes how heavy the touch is and that the goalkeeper might get there first………It is a penalty b/c a clear hold but no more than a yellow for the reasons given.
On the Dallas / Colorado PK dealio, the penalty kick itself did not result in a goal, and neither 'encroacher' had any impact on that result. The follow up play did result in a goal, but this was sometime after the penalty was taken.
I think the refs were correct.