REAL MADRID 0 vs 4 FC BARCELONA | EL CLÁSICO | LALIGA 2024/25 MD11

By /



A Clásico to remember as Hansi Flick and his extraordinary team conquer the Bernabéu in style and go six points clear at the top of the table.


Watch The Live Action Now!

SUBSCRIBE NOW:
▶ www.youtube.com/user/fcbarcelona

📱 App: http://barca.link/kXum50R6rNO
⚽ Barça One: http://barca.link/I32O50QVbj2
🌐 Site: www.fcbarcelona.com
📸 Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/fcbarcelona
𝕏 Twitter: http://twitter.com/FCBarcelona
🎶 Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@fcbarcelona
🔵 Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/fcbarcelona
👾 Discord: https://discord.gg/fcbarcelonaofficial
🛍 Get all official Barça apparel from FC Barcelona’s online store: http://barca.link/j8QH30qQh4Y
🔵🔴 #FCBarcelona

source

36 thoughts on “REAL MADRID 0 vs 4 FC BARCELONA | EL CLÁSICO | LALIGA 2024/25 MD11”

  2. @options1704

    No matter what these young generation does, they can never be on the same level as messi and ronaldo. They would barely try to miss such golden finish plays. Man, miss them 😢

  7. @Shoaiblone50

    What a great victory for FC Barcelona in the El Clasico. The best feeling in the world is after winning the El Clasico as a culer. Thank you Hansi Flick for this victory. Visca El Barca💙❤️

  11. @GNHGJGKGHMYJLI

    News Weekly: “Stain on the World”

    Australian magazine News Weekly published an article on June 19 written by Patrick J. Byrne, immediate past National President of the National Civic Council (NCC). Citing David Matas’ work, the article said China’s industrialized mass killing of prisoners of conscience to harvest their organs for profit is “a spreading stain on the world.”

    According to Matas’ investigations, China’s organ harvesting expanded after Falun Gong practitioners began silently protesting at Tiananmen Square in 1999. “As these practitioners do not smoke or drink alcohol, they provided clean organs for transplant compared with others in Chinese prisons, where hepatitis is rife,” he explained.

    As the availability of Falun Gong prisoners declined, new groups have been targeted for organ harvesting – Tibetans, Uyghurs and other Xinjiang/East Turkestan minorities, and House Christians, he added.

    “Based on the advertised price of organs, this industry, heavily managed by the Chinese military, is estimated to earn about $US8.9 billion annually, mostly from foreigners coming from South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt,” the article stated. Matas’ team has amassed a vast database of evidence on the industry, although gathering this evidence was not easy.

    The article continued, “The mass killing of prisoners of conscience for their organs does not have the same visibility as many other wrongs. The victims cannot speak. Their bodies, cremated, cannot be autopsied.” According to Matas, “The crimes occur in settings – detention centres and hospitals – where there are no bystanders, only perpetrators and victims. The few whistleblowers mostly do not want to make public statements both because of the risk to themselves and their families and the wish to avoid admitting publicly their own guilt. Chinese hospital, prison and detention records are not publicly available.”

    The CCP engages in systematic cover-up, closing down data streams once cited, and denying all evidence of the abuse, even evidence which comes from their own records, Matas explained. They fabricate contrary evidence, which is easy enough to see through with diligence, but can be deceptive for the unwary, he added.

    Matas’s team interviewed people who have been to China for transplants. They said that appointments can be made for transplants of vital organs – liver, lung and heart – at fixed times or on days’ or weeks’ notice. But in other places in the world, waiting times are months and years. That means that “someone is being killed for that transplant,” he said.

    Human rights attorney David Matas calls on the Australian legislature to expose the CCP’s forced organ harvesting during a press conference in front the Australian Parliament Building.

    “China is the largest transplant country in the world. Yet, until 2010, it had no deceased organ donation system. That system produces only a tiny number of donations even today. So, what can be done to counter this 20th-century horror?” the article reported. A 2015 Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs mandates state parties to prohibit complicity by nationals or permanent residents in transplant abuse abroad. Fifteen states have so far ratified the Convention.

    “Separately, Israel, Taiwan, Italy, South Korea, Britain and Canada have legislated against extraterritorial complicity in organ-transplant abuse. The U.S. Congress has prepared a bill [Editor’s note: the Falun Gong Protection Act] requiring revocation of passports of those complicit in forced organ harvesting, reports on that complicity, and sanctions on the complicit,” stated the report.

    In addressing transplant tourism, Matas said that there should be mandatory reporting by health practitioners to health administrators of organ transplants, just as there is for reporting incompetence and sexual abuse, child abuse, incapacity, communicable diseases, and so on. Health practitioners are able to identify organ-transplant tourists because they require ongoing anti-rejection drugs.

    Citing Matas, the report concluded, “While there is a wealth of human-rights violations around the world, it is hard to match China’s mass killing of innocents, of prisoners of conscience, for their organs.”

    News Weekly is published by the National Civic Council (NCC), a grassroots organization in Australia with over 80 years of history that aims to restore traditional values.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top