34 thoughts on “Is there a bias against American players in world football?”

  1. It’s not bias if they don’t have any top players to rate ? Pulisic was quality about 4 years ago before injuries but the current squad are all decent role players and nothing more

  2. Football āš½ļø is not a national men’s sport in the US if basketball and American football wouldn’t exist and every boy would be playing football instead they probably would be world class

  3. It’s because they haven’t produced quality or elite players, they don’t have a history doing that. Yet they complain about bias when Mexico for example have produced and won international trophies and get less opportunities in Europe

  4. Americans stop victim mentality, football is a talent and you have what it takes to be footballer nobody will stop you, if my African brothers can shine you American can too! So stop looking everything through vicious lens

  5. 100% there is bias. The people who think there is not a bias are delusional. I am highly critical of the US team, particularly under Berhalter, but Pulisic would be definitely more valued if he was English, Spanish, French, German or Italian. I think because football (soccer) is not taken seriously in the US that there is resentment around the world where it is nothing short of a religion. With that, Europeans in particular do not want to give any US players respect.

  6. I’d rather be a team that’s been getting better like the USA then be a team like England who’s main sport is footy but somehow they can’t win anything. 2 euro final losses 1 World Cup back in the 1900 and there national team was better 20 years ago. On the contrary soccer in the USA is getting bigger by the day and the national team is much much better then it was 20 years ago unlike England😐 Also English players are mad overrated they are obviously good but not all the hype.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top