Andrew Wiebe breaks down Matchday 8’s most controversial decisions on Instant Replay.
📺 Watch every match on Apple TV: http://apple.co/MLS
The 🐐 plays here: https://www.mlssoccer.com/messi/
➡️ Subscribe Now: https://www.youtube.com/c/mls
➡️ Follow us on:
– TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mls?lang=en
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mls
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLS
– Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MLS
➡️ Para Español:
– YouTube Español: https://www.youtube.com/@MLS-Español
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mlses
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLSes
– Facebook: facebook.com/espanol.mls
For more information about MLS, go to the league’s official website: http://www.MLSsoccer.com, en español http://www.MLSes.com
#mls #highlights #goals
source
At 2:55, why would you try to establish the last point of contact of the passer, when Law 11 clearly states that "The first point of contact … should be used"? From regularly watching Inside Video Review, it seems like MLS VARs correctly use the first point of contact, but they do have a notoriously high bar for a "clear and obvious" offside, which is why I assume they chose not to send this play for review.
Can't believe you didn't review golazo stolen from Evander by VAR. Just no way that was a clear and obvious foul, the replay only showed it in the bottom corner of the screen and it just showed them getting their feet tangled.
Obvious penalty 💯%, the defender followed through, thus clipping Messi.
Refs and VAR in MLS it's a joke…
never a pk
That Miami pen was soft. It would not have been called had it been a Colorado player taken down in the box in that manner. No pen, ref got it right the first time and VAR intervened.
3:18 looks to me like the player in the offside position slows down the defender obstructing him from defending, Im betting thats why the call was made.
Shocker, AW slurping up the Miami slop.
При всей любви к Интер Майями, такие решения разрушают репутацию любого клуба и отворачивают многих любителей футбола в сторону других видов спорта
@mls
Nice work on your recent videos! I noticed a few thumbnail tweaks that could significantly boost your click-through rate. I’d love to share some sample designs with you—open to it?”
Corta la trayectoria del jugador del Inter y no tiene posibilidad de jugar el balón. Penalti 👍
0:47, of course Miami's #12 embellished! Players know MLS refs buy the acting 99% of the time. No, Andrew, it was not a good decision, that type of mild contact does not merit a penalty.
1:16 penalty by european football standard.
Drew Fisher is still the best ref in the US with his quick decisions and many years experience as a video reviewer he brings the newest level of experience that most refs don’t have hence his adjustment from red to yellow. He’s gonna kill it this summer in the 🌎🏆
This was definitely re-refereeing the game. One of the early angles of the play clearly show the referee looking at the play. It was not clear and obvious. The way Bright threw himself down was not natural. Clear embellishment.
1:57 No, the question is not "who grabbed who?" The question is "who grabbed whom?" !!!!
0:30 It's a foul — clear physical contact from the defender. The defender from Colorado knew he was losing control of the ball, and Miami was waiting for a mistake. It may look like it's not a foul at first, but it's obviously a foul because of the physical contact.
But if the defender had been in front of the Miami player, then the situation would clearly be a foul against the Miami player, because he would have been behind the Colorado defender. It could have been a completely different call.
LOOK THE situation 2:08 See there Offensive player behind the defencer.
What about the Union vs DC United game where there was an obvious red card studs up tackle around the 60th minute?
3:17 that looks on, even with the distorted angle.
ETA: looks like the AR is ahead of the play (between the goal and defender). That angle would make it look like the attacker is off, even if he isn't.
Toronto vs Austin: That is nowhere near red and Wiebe knows it! Also, I see no contact with the face whatsoever! I would’ve shown Edwards a yellow for simulation!
I guess the bigger question is how in 2026 does england not have the camera angles needed for VAR reviews?
Not talking about the penalty kick that San Diego was given feels like a big miss here
MLS – stop grabbing, stop the sloppy pushes, stop the diving. We need to improve the product of MLS. Give em all REDS.
Missed also the no call that should have been reviewed and goal overturned for Miami at 45’+ stoppage. I was in the stands and saw the blatant push in the back by Miami to get space for the header goal.
Honestly the austin/toronto is closer to a yellow for embellishment for Toronto. Contact to the head is a serious issue, so lying about it shouldn’t be tolerated.
﴿وَمَن يَبْتَغِ غَيْرَ الْإِسْلَامِ دِينًا فَلَن يُقْبَلَ مِنْهُ وَهُوَ فِي الْآخِرَةِ مِنَ الْخَاسِرِينَ﴾
“And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted from him, and in the Hereafter he will be among the losers.”