50 thoughts on “If America’s best athletes played soccer… would we be the best? 👀 #sportsdebate #soccer #basketball”

  1. I get your point man, but frankly Crouch was never a player worth mentioning, if not in few occasions: he was an average player, with a good mentionable peak.
    The only tall and also very good is probably, at this point, Haaland.

  2. Basketball players wouldn’t have the fitness to play football ⚽️ the height would be an advantage if they played in goal or were a defender, But pro South American, European and British footballer. There fitness is crazy

  3. They are slow, stiff and clumsy as fuck. Football requires more skill that holding a ball in the hand and randomly running into other people. In football these people would be considered absolute cripples that wouldn't even make the team in amateurs Sundays league

  4. 100%. In America we celebrate athletes more than anywhere in the world. If we cared about soccer the same way we cared about our sports, we’d be the best because we have the biggest “jock” culture

  5. It would take them a thousand years to play average soccer. If soccer became the main sport, the U.S. would need about 100 years just to compete with top countries, and 200 years to produce a single player who could become number one.

  6. Good point, awful examples. Us dominates olympics. If THOSE athletes were kicking a ball around from birth, especially in the hyper athletic modern game, US would have a huge talent pool

  7. Im sorry but if they grew up playing soccer instead and gained the necessary skills to play at the highest level with their athleticism, no country in the world would want to see a front three of Westbrook, Wall and D Rose back in the early 2010s. Stop it

  8. No… no you would not have the best in the world😂 in the usa NBA is way bigger than football (not saying soccer).. thereby giving basketball a much larger platform and more attention/hype obviously. So yes, you guys have the best basketball players in the world, in my opinion. But football? If yall top athletes grew up playing football… it doesnt necessarily mean that they would be the best in the world. Besides that, no other country can "out-basketball" the states, yall have a much stronger foundation for basketball. But the USA, cannot out-football multiple other countries whose foundation is FOOTBALL.

    Edit:…. correct me if im wrong on the heights but…dwight howard 7'0", steph curry 6'3", Lebron James 6'7"…. that stability and agility is not going to do them any justice in football… those are goalkeeper (7 foot, and 6'7") and mainly centerback heights only stephen curry at 6'3"😂😂😂 the tallest world class footballer was peter crouch from liverpool, and he was the skinniest man on the pitch… let that sink in😂😂

  9. The problem is that Americans don’t understand the importance of strategies in football. American football and Basketball have almost zero strategies that make the games unique only relying on small tactics and better athleticism

  10. If the US, richest, diverse and fairly populated country with amazing resources dedicated to sports, cared about football (ie, soccer) as much as they care about basketball, they for sure would have world-class players. It wouldn’t be Steve Curry exactly.

  11. Actually Jan Koller was better and he was 6'8. He was a player at Czech Republic. And sadly when he got injured in 2004 WC, his coach replaced him with a player a little taller. His replacement was terrible.

  12. I think if it was our primary sport we would have produced a lot of extremely good talent but thats just because of the amount of diversity and population size that exists in the US. Now as far as specific athletes that could translate into association football i would say the most likely would be hlafbacks, receivers and defensive backs. Some basketball players maybe but im uncertain. ALL of them would need extensive endurance training though.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top