Andrew Wiebe breaks down all the biggest and most controversial plays from MLS Matchday 31.
📺 Watch every match with MLS Season Pass on Apple TV: http://apple.co/MLS
The 🐐 plays here. Join The Messi Insider for insider news, early access to Messi promotions and more: https://www.mlssoccer.com/messi/
➡️ Subscribe Now: https://www.youtube.com/c/mls
➡️ Follow us on:
– TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mls?lang=en
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mls
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLS
– Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MLS
➡️ Para Español:
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mlses
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLSes
– Facebook: facebook.com/espanol.mls
For more information about MLS, go to the league’s official website: http://www.MLSsoccer.com
#mls #highlights #mlsseasonpass
source
Why do they never card for repeated embellishment?
Why don’t we have offside technology? It’s been available and used for over 4 years now
I wanna see a video of you talking about Orlando sc vs trash Miami
Classic choice of MLS not talking about the abuse Seattle players and trainers took after beating Miami in leagues cup final. Even if it's another tourny, Suarez the Spitter, Busquets the Puncher, and Chokehold Falcon still represent Miami🤦♂️
Am I the only one that doesn’t agree with the Revs goal? He looked offsides both times. Didn’t even look close
Wait so it has to be clear and obvious… Unless it's against St. Louis and allows Thomas Muller to score his first goal?
More contact in both the Toronto non calls than there was in the Vancouver vs STL call 😂😂
Hell no with Makhanya. He should have only had one yellow in all. The first yellow was NOT a yellow!!!!
since the rule is "clear & obvious", use of "the line" technology (or whatever it's called) is ALWAYS a violation of the VAR rule, therefore it's use should also ALWAYS be a violation of both FIFA & league policies (regardless of where in the world the league plays) as well as whatever match fixing laws are in place in the game's jurisdiction
0:10 gonogo cmon it clearly says gAnago
Classic Wiebe mess-around… At 1:39 the attacker beats the defender and the defender grabs him. Penalty is the right call even though the attacker "probably doesn't have to go down" (meaning it wasn't a lot of contact). However, at 4:16 this is NOT a penalty, even though the attacker beats the defender and the defender grabs him because "it's not much contact." I honestly don't care if these calls are penalties or if the ref decides to let play continue. But, they should be called the same way in my opinion. I don't see a significant difference.
Since it wasn’t called on the pitch, in video review was Suarez’s expectorate with clear and obvious malicious intent? Under this guidelines then….
For MLS to develop, good players and coaches are important, but the quality of systematic and accurate refereeing is even more crucial. Since referees can make mistakes, VAR exists. However, if matches still suffer from wrong decisions even after using VAR, MLS will not be able to progress.
They've talked about Leagues Cup on here before, why no mention of the most controversial thing all week in the final?
Saying it's a foul on Toronto at 3:30 is a joke, right? Right??? He got his leg kicked out from behind him and HE'S the one who fouled?? lol
I completely hate the fact that the presence of an offside attacker can cause a play to be offside simply because it changes how the keeper plays. If the keeper was not INTERFERED with (and by that I do Not include having a decision be more complicated) then the player being offside should be irrelevant.
Thats not the way the rule is written, thats how it Should be in my opinion.
1:51 If a player can stay on his feet after the defender lets him go, it shouldn’t be a penalty. I think a yellow for simulation would be reasonable in this spot. Defenders need to be more careful on plays like these though!
Where is the instant replay for missed red cards after Messi and m13 gang fought Seattle after getting spanked?
Look. I know its not MLS, what about leagues cup final and Miami?