Diego Luna Red Card, Kevin Duncan Horse Collar Tackle, Son Heung-min Earns PK in MLS Debut & More!



In this week’s episode of Instant Replay Son Heung-min wasted no time making headlines in his MLS debut, winning a penalty against Chicago. Meanwhile, USMNT and RSL star Diego Luna saw red in a controversial decision after being horse-collared to the ground. Plus, we break down a serious foul play tackle in Cincinnati vs. Charlotte FC and more of the weekend’s biggest referee decisions.

đŸ“ș Watch every match with MLS Season Pass on Apple TV: http://apple.co/MLS

The 🐐 plays here. Join The Messi Insider for insider news, early access to Messi promotions and more: https://www.mlssoccer.com/messi/

âžĄïž Subscribe Now: https://www.youtube.com/c/mls

âžĄïž Follow us on:
– TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mls?lang=en
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mls
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLS
– Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MLS

âžĄïž Para Español:
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mlses
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLSes
– Facebook: facebook.com/espanol.mls

For more information about MLS, go to the league’s official website: http://www.MLSsoccer.com

#mls #highlights #mlsseasonpass

source

38 thoughts on “Diego Luna Red Card, Kevin Duncan Horse Collar Tackle, Son Heung-min Earns PK in MLS Debut & More!”

  1. We're not going to talk about the fact that DUNCAN'S RED CARD WAS REVIEWED AFTER A PLAY HAD HAPPENED, MEANING THAT HE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN SENT OFF IN THE GAME! Should he have? In my opinion, yes. Does it no longer matter after they screwed up and did not review after a play had happened? Also, YES! I don't understand why this wasn't mentioned here, forsberg literally took the free kick that was earned by the Luna "foul" meaning that the play cannot be reviewed after the fact.

  2. ESPN is running a story on how Professional Referee Organization (PRO) did nothing after referee Tim Ford was caught attending an LAFC match. Ford has a history of atrocious calls going back to 2023. Ford made 2 more bad calls in this week's instant replay. Now we know from Ford's wife Instagram feed that he has a favorite MLS team and it shouldn't surprise anyone that Ford's favorite team benefited from the outcome of the San Jose Vancouver game. What could possibly go wrong when MLS referees pick a favorite team?

  3. UNION GOT ROBBED!!! Spread the word! DOOOP!!! (Baribos goal got taken away when the Toronto player literally made a touch and Sullivan got punched and nothing happened)

  4. "The Independent Review Panel, consisting of one representative from U.S. Soccer, one representative from Canada Soccer and one independent representative nominated by the Professional Referee Organization, has unanimously voted to rescind the one-game suspension and accompanying fine for the second yellow card issued to Vancouver Whitecaps FC defender Édier Ocampo in the 27th minute of Vancouver’s match against the San Jose Earthquakes on August 9. Ocampo is now eligible to play in Vancouver’s next regular season match vs. Houston Dynamo FC on Sunday, August 17."

    Thought that should be appended to the comments section, just to show that an independent review agrees that Tim Ford overreacted.

  5. I’m an FCC fan, so I know I’m biased, but I think the pull from Zaha, albeit slight, is sufficient to either be a foul, or at the very least remove doubt as to the lack of intent or recklessness behind Anunga’s challenge. The only reason he was late was because of Zaha’s pull. My issue with the commentator’s point about Anunga “shrugging” the contact off is that it suggests that players should fall at the slightest contact in order to guarantee a call, no matter how slight the contact. And what does that get you? Instances like the Houston-Austin penalty, where it’s technically contact and therefore a foul, but so slight that it’s “85% simulation.” Which is it? Either we want our players to fall at every touch or we want them to play through the minimal contact. I think it should be the latter, and we shouldn’t penalize players for doing so.

  6. So my favorite part about the FC Cincinnati discussion, is that absolutely none of what you said is what people are taking issue with. Some people feel that the tackle attempt by Zaha that slows Anunga down should have been whistled for a foul. I am not sold on that but the bigger issue is AFTER the review, FC Cincinnati had the free kick. What needed to be explained was how did FCC get the red card but then received the kick. Was the foul given in favor of Cincy after the review? If so, how was that not taken into consideration on the red card review? All questions you did not answer and is the reason FC Cincinnati fans were outraged. Nobody is question that it was egregious contact, what is in question is the lack of continuity and clarity. Yet again this show obfuscates the questions that should be being asked of the officials. VAR should have open audio available for the broadcast. Until then, VAR is creating more issues than fixing problems.

  7. I noticed A LOT of refs are going for the VERY SOFT second yellow now for a red card because it does not interfere with their egos by having it challenged by VAR. I have never seen as many second yellows since VAR started.

    The Vancouver one was not a second yellow., and it was not even a foul. The defender has every right to exist. The fact that the attacker is not looking where he is going is not the defenders fault. And I say this as a Timbers fan and have a deeper dislike of Vancouver BC than most other fans.

  8. The reviews here are way to in favour of the ref. The commentator needs to realize that most of the calls on the field were wrong. VAR helped in some instances but he is supporting the on the field call too much. It’s the initial calls that are the problem. Then the ref puts himself in a bad situation and the players are just suppose to suck it up and take it because they can’t find evidence to over turn the call. Only the Luna call was done correctly over all. The rest were wrong on the field call and wrong decision to either ignore VAR or not think there was enough evidence. The Ocampo was dead wrong as was the penalty afterwards as the shooter could have just as easily got a diving penalty. He’s just throwing his body to get a call. Ford should retire.

  9. This issue with the call on Cincy was the fact that the ref played advantage to Cincy when we didn’t even have a clear opportunity at goal so realistically the foul should’ve been back on the foul Charlottes committed on Bucha.

  10. Crazy that Diego Luna got a red card when the AR called a foul against NY but the central ref calls foul on Luna😭 var can’t get involved but the AR can.

  11. Wiebe you moron, the problem is that the play should have been blown dead when Zaha fouled Anunga. There was no advantage on the play and if you watch, the ref pointed the wrong way for the penalty. It makes no sense that a red was shown and FCC maintained possession.

  12. Not dealing with mass confrontation is annoying. I don’t think a “only captains can talk” is needed if dissent is addressed. Let’s learn from rugby.

  13. The question I still have about the Luna-Duncan incident is about the yellow the referee seems to be rescinding after the VAR review (3:20). Was Duncan cautioned originally? At first I thought he was rescinding Luna’s second yellow, but Luna never returned to the field. Halp?

  14. I'd really like to see the yellow cards for embellishments come back, u can't fake a foul a second later after both your feet are clearly on the ground 😂

  15. 6:15 I think the MLS has gone down a dangerous path with contact in the box being considered in favour of a pen. I am fine with the idea of VAR having to determine a clear and obvious error to send the ref to the monitor, but I would much rather a change at the monitor so that the Ref must re-evaluate the contact. Was there contact, Yes, did the contact alter the trajectory of the attacking player, I don't see that happening. For me, if he goes down it is either his error or simulation, not a foul. The pen was only held up because technically the defender and attacker had some contact… 

    I think that after the call on the field was made everything did follow the rulebook, technically can't be overturned. I also think that almost every rule related to VAR needs to be changed for next season, VAR is taking too long for "clear and obvious calls" Sometimes in excess of 2-3 minutes! A lot of reviews are very soft, and when it is clearly an error like in this case, it can't be overturned by the ref because there is a slight nudge of contact.

    I also disagree with the Yellow call on Ocampo, foul sure, but would that be a yellow anywhere else on the field?

  16. Ortiz flop = 100% simulation. You always use the term “negligible contact” this has to be the definition of “negligible contact”. You also didn’t mention it took at least 8 minutes of review to come to the decision, which means it’s not clear and obvious.

  17. This has to be an all-time worst week of MLS refereeing, so many unexplainably bad decisions, of course all explained away with the same script every week by the league-owned media đŸ€Šâ€â™‚

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top