Did Luis Suárez Deserve a PK in the 102nd Minute!? Why Two Goals Were Disallowed in New England?



Andrew Wiebe is back for another edition of Instant Replay as he breaks down the most controversial plays from Matchday 35.

📺 Watch every match with MLS Season Pass on Apple TV: http://apple.co/MLS

The 🐐 plays here. Join The Messi Insider for insider news, early access to Messi promotions and more: https://www.mlssoccer.com/messi/

➡️ Subscribe Now: https://www.youtube.com/c/mls

➡️ Follow us on:
– TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mls?lang=en
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mls
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLS
– Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MLS

➡️ Para Español:
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mlses
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLSes
– Facebook: facebook.com/espanol.mls

For more information about MLS, go to the league’s official website: http://www.MLSsoccer.com

#mls #highlights #mlsseasonpass

source

32 thoughts on “Did Luis Suárez Deserve a PK in the 102nd Minute!? Why Two Goals Were Disallowed in New England?”

  1. Nope. Nope. Nope. The first one was without a doubt a penalty. Check out the Major League Soccer highlights and pause the video exactly at 3:32! Miami player senses the contact, sticks his leg out (like any good attacking player does) defenders arm is on the shoulder/neck area, there's contact through the lower body before the eventual contact of the ball. In real-time it may appear he "got the ball" first, but this is not the case, and besides, you can "get the ball" and it still be a foul! Defender was caught, it was from behind, and if you slow it down, clearly made contact/pulled back on the Miami player prior to luckily getting a touch of the ball. This should have been kept a penalty and second yellow. Love that we have all this technology at our disposal yet they continue to make terrible calls. You need CLEAR proof from the VAR to overturn the call on the field, CLEAR.

  2. Didn’t even look at Acosta getting absolutely cleaned out in the 5th minute of Cincy vs LAFC? God forbid the league has to say something bad about Chivas USA, huh?

  3. 1:00 slow this down to frame-by-frame, that should have been a penalty. The defender's thigh impacts the offensive player just before touching the ball. Foul and red card. Miami was robbed.

  4. Not only he hits Gomez leg before hitting the ball he also pulls Gomez down by the shoulder with his right hand too. Y'all didn't put the frame by frame cause you know exactly what it proves

  5. I don’t really agree with the foul call on NE second goal. Doesn’t seem like much contact. If that’s a foul, there are 3 or 4 fouls every time someone takes a corner. But I could be wrong lol. Just didn’t see much in it.

  6. I didn’t watch any of the Miami game. But if someone did, was the added time legit? Was there that much stoppage time to add almost 12 extra minutes? Feel like the league gives Miami so much extra time when they are not ahead.

  7. Aren’t you supposed to get a yellow card for making the VAR symbol to the ref? It would have been funny if the ref took back the yellow for the foul, and gave a second yellow for making the VAR symbol. 😂

  8. That’s insane that they took away NE’s goal after that push from behind but in the NYCFC vs IM game Bright got two handed shoved to the ground off the ball and there was no foul called. MLS refs are so inconsistent.

  9. To be a foul, the ball must be in the field of play. If the contact is made when the ball is out of bounds, then it is not a foul but a misconduct – and not punishable by a free kick.

    Therefore, there is no penalty kick in favor of Suarez. However, the goal keeper should receive a yellow or red. That is the proper call.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top