“A very very bad mistake!” | Dermot Gallagher analyses Luis Diaz disallowed goal vs Tottenham!



SUBSCRIBE ► https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPL
PREMIER LEAGUE HIGHLIGHTS ► https://bit.ly/SkyPLHighlights2324
GET THIS SEASON’S PREMIER LEAGUE SHIRTS HERE ► https://bit.ly/SkySportsShop
Speaking on Ref Watch, former Premier League referee, Dermot Gallagher, analyses the controversial Luis Diaz goal for Liverpool against Tottenham…#football #premierleague #soccer

Watch Premier League LIVE on Sky Sports here ► http://bit.ly/WatchSkyPL
►TWITTER: https://twitter.com/skysportsPL
►FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/skysportsfootball
►WEBSITE: http://www.skysports.com/football

MORE FROM SKY SPORTS ON YOUTUBE:
►SKY SPORTS PREMIER LEAGUE: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPL
►SKY SPORTS FOOTBALL: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyFootball
►SKY SPORTS BOXING: http://bit.ly/SSBoxingSub
►SKY SPORTS CRICKET: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket
►SOCCER AM: http://bit.ly/SoccerAMSub
►SKY SPORTS F1: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1
►SKY SPORTS: http://bit.ly/SkySportsSub
►SKY SPORTS GOLF: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf

source

28 thoughts on ““A very very bad mistake!” | Dermot Gallagher analyses Luis Diaz disallowed goal vs Tottenham!”

  1. Is there a law of the game if a player plough through studs up from behind another player and PGOL say if Kovacic was given a red card it would have gone against the spirit of the game….these referees give reason for folks to think they are compromised

  2. I do hope they learn hard from this colossal error,human or not take another few minutes! Stop the game immediately…refs hearing something as he is running around watching what's going on! Hardly concentrating and listening properly.

  3. I like so many others still wonder why England or VAR in general don't use direct language "Check complete, onside" or "Check complete, goal"? Is there anything in the 'protocols' that says that the officials can't use direct language?

  4. A mistake is ordering a choclate milkshake and getting a vanilla one.

    These are people being paid to do one job with countless technology at thier disposal. This shouldnt happen no excuses…

  5. Hot take: problem isn’t giving refs too much power, it’s giving them too little. By making them robots who have to follow the letter of the law we don’t allow for enough human common sense. Why have human refs if we don’t want them to be human? We can keep creating new rules for every time this kind of thing happens, just like we can create new rules for Health and Safety, but that stops individuals taking responsibility for others’ safety besides from writing policy.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top