Andrew Wiebe breaks down Matchday 28’s most controversial plays on Instant Replay.
You can also watch every match with MLS Season Pass on Apple TV: http://apple.co/MLS
Want to see similar content to this? Subscribe to our channel for more: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…
Follow us on:
– TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mls?lang=en
– Instagram: http://instagram.com/mls
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLS
– Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MLS
For more information about MLS, go to the league’s official website: http://www.MLSsoccer.com
#mls #highlights #mlsseasonpass
00:00 Instant Replay Matchday 28
00:19 VAR overturns Inter Miami penalty call
01:34 STL equalizer upheld by VAR
02:42 VAR awards ORL PK for a handball
03:36 Tyler Miller yellow card + penalty kick
04:48 No penalty for CHI after VAR
06:13 Second yellow card for Gimenez
06:51 Another PK decision in LA
07:09 Pereira second yellow card
07:49 Evander concedes a PK in Portland
08:11 Logan Ndenbe PK Foul
source
This a a great channel that clearly shows the referees are doing their best. 👍
The linesman was looking dead at that offside and still waved it off. Guess MANSAARNAULT really knows what’s up
The way that defender backed off was embarrassing. But MANSAARNAULT warned us about these mistakes
BRING BACK SIMON!
As a St. Louis fan, that angle was never shown during the match. So there was pretty much no way to understand the call. After seeing that angle, I still don't like it, but I can understand the penalty decision.
Miller's yellow card was for reckless. the shot was already taken and no attacker could reach the ball so that removes DOGSO and SPA.
agree with most this week, but that St. Louis handball penalty was an egregiously bad decision. He had his arm tucked, it’s in a natural position for what he’s doing, he can’t remove his forearm from his body, and there is no possible way that from that distance he could’ve meant to block the ball.
A lot of these “natural/unnatural position” calls have defenders focused on defending unnaturally (hands-behind-the-back, arms tucked in, etc.) to avoid handballs. That’s not the purpose of the rule. They should be free to use arms for balance and marking without fear of the ball striking their arms accidentally.
Portland fan, I completely agree, its a penalty, but what about all the other bad calls that game, every time vancouver went down it was a foul, but the vanoucver foul on evander towards the end wasn't called.
I agree with your conclusion that the VAR got the handball call (first segment in the video) right, but the fact that the on-field official even called a handball in the first place goes to my complaint about this rule, which I've raised many times: as often interpreted by officials, the practical result is that defenders in the area feel constrained to waddle around like penguins with their arms crossed behind their backs just to make it obvious to the on-field official that the arms aren't extended in an "unnatural position". Which leads me to 3:35. That arm is not an unnatural position for the athletic move the player is engaged in.
Im a galaxy fan and that was a foul. Cmon.
It looks to me that MLS is using VAR as it was designed to be. In Europe, the establishment were so anti VAR that it took years for it to be finally accepted. But even with that, they try and use it as little as possible to give the referee the call, so there’s still an infuriating amount of decision mistakes being made.
If they had used VAR as they should have, EPL teams would have taken at least 5 Champions League titles off Barcelona and Real Madrid.
But at the time FIFA, under Sep Blatter and his cronies, were scared of the power of English football (they even blocked the EPL from running season games in the US and other overseas places) and we’re trying to balance the power in Europe.
Denis Bouanga. See something say something. Check his goal.
As a ref, I love this show!!
With the exception of the player names, I could cut and paste your dialog around 5:42 onto the action at 3:42 and it would be totally accurate. Neither is a foul.
Besides the two calls showed, Joe Dickerson made the entire game about himself. There were about 50 calls during the game and it was bad for both teams.
Ok let’s be honest. If that foul against Chicago (I think it was Gutierrez) happens against my team then it’s a PK but if my team commits that contact then it’s not a foul and it’s just a coming together on a 50/50 ball.
Haha 😂
Bullshit handball call, definitely not in an unnatural position and it sucks we cant ever get a handball call go our way. Just look at Austin in match day 27 (last week), inter Miami in match day 26, or Toronto in match day 24… All similar scenarios and yet we never got a pk for one of them… Sad how we have VAR and cant ever be consistent. Also sad how half our loses come down to a pk
3:17 this ball would have hit him even if he had no arms. Absolute trash was this call.
Caranza – 'shot'/crossed the ball, left his feet in the air, under no control and collides into the keeper. Keeper has a right to stand his ground and didn't actively trip/push/hold etc the airborne Caranza. They collide. To me it's as much incidental contact with two players colliding into one another after the ball has been played away. If anything, Caranza launching himself toward the ball and the keeper is the one playing recklessly. The keeper is just in the path of the flying forward. Caranza lauching himself forward to get to the ball first is what causes the collision. Caranza got his shot/cross off and the ball is going out of bounds. The play is basically done, over, and the players run into one another.
Much like in the next call (LAvCHI) you discuss where the defender and the attacker collide, arguably in a more violent collision than the one above, while going for the ball. In that situation, you argue for a 'good no call.'
👍👍👍
Markanich should have been penalized for embellishment / attempt to deceive the referee. They have got to cut some of this fakery out of the game with cards after review.
Wish you would have looked at the Glesnes yellow card. That was a textbook tackle and not worthy of a foul or card.
How are we not talking about the Benteke non-goal from the DC-Philly game?
Very good calls
Philly fan here and I agree that with the yellow rather than red on the DC keeper. He was going for the ball, got there late and the ball was gone. Given that it happened in the box, it's yellow rather than red even if Carranza hadn't played it so far away.
That behind view is not clear at all, the angle is obviously gonna block some of the perception. It was called out on the field and there is 0 definitive proof that was wrong. The onfield decision should've stayed. If it was called in on the field I'd have said the same.
I think I'll have to wait for PRO's analysis of the Rosell challenge (around 5:30). I see Guiterrez get a touch and Rosell not get a touch. Charge on Rosell, PK. Anywhere else on the pitch if we see a challenge where one player gets a touch and the other goes through the player we call a foul. Why not here?
❤❤❤❤
Outside the 2nd yellow those were great calls!
Finally VAR is coming in handy!
Some great VAR usage here. Would be nice if Webb could make the EPL do it the same way.
I have said it before, and I will say it again. I really love this concept and wish for it to be used in English Football as well! Maybe one day :))
Second
🦁🦁